[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Hangs [ was Re: Patch 411 ]
From: |
Dan Nelson |
Subject: |
Re: Hangs [ was Re: Patch 411 ] |
Date: |
Wed, 4 Jun 2003 14:19:19 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.4i |
In the last episode (Jun 04), Jeff Jirsa said:
> I'm still seeing serious instability in 0.1.3a. I'm new to this list,
> but having checked most of the archives on Savannah, I still don't
> see any solution to the hang listed in various bugs. I've changed the
> close(fd++) call in closeall() to close-on-exec (suggestion
> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/spamass-milt-list/2002-11/msg00005.html
> ) and the crashes are down to twice a day,
>
> I believe it's similar to
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=2403&group_id=1083
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=1099&group_id=1083,
> http://savannah.nongnu.org/support/?func=detailsupport&support_id=101558&group_id=1083
I think those those are all crash bugs, not hangs. Bug 1099 does
provide a gdb backtrace but there's no useful data in it (i.e. none of
the stacks include any milter functions).
I think the list archive thread you referenced was due to a hang when
multiple forked processes still had libmilter socket connections open,
so that really shouldn't affect you if your process is really crashing.
If you can get a coredump and a good stack trace, that'd be great.
Also if it crashes a lot, try runing it in the foreground under
valgrind and see if it sees anything.
--
Dan Nelson
address@hidden
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, (continued)
- Re: Patch 411, Ronan Waide, 2003/06/03
- Re: Patch 411, Thomas Cameron, 2003/06/03
- Re: Patch 411, Jason Granat, 2003/06/03
- Re: Patch 411, Thomas Cameron, 2003/06/03
- Re: Patch 411, Mike Tancsa, 2003/06/04
- Re: Patch 411, Chuck Yerkes, 2003/06/04
- Hangs [ was Re: Patch 411 ], Jeff Jirsa, 2003/06/04
- Re: Hangs [ was Re: Patch 411 ],
Dan Nelson <=
- Re: Patch 411, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/04