[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Patch 411
From: |
Thomas Cameron |
Subject: |
Re: Patch 411 |
Date: |
Tue, 3 Jun 2003 15:17:02 -0500 |
What is the correct syntax to have it redirect tagged spam to another mail
account or an mbox? I tried:
spamass-milter -r /var/spool/mail/spam
and then:
spamass-milter -r address@hidden
but every message disappeared and I saw these in /var/log/maillog:
Jun 3 12:00:32 laptop2 spamd[15886]: processing message
<200306031700.h53H0Usr0 address@hidden> for root:99.
Jun 3 12:00:32 laptop2 spamd[15886]: clean message (-0.4/5.0) for root:99
in 0.6 seconds, 3746 bytes.
Jun 3 12:00:32 laptop2 sendmail[15879]: h53H0UYZ015879: Milter add: header:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.4
required=5.0\n\ttests=FAILURE_NOTICE_2\n\tversion=2.55
Jun 3 12:00:32 laptop2 sendmail[15879]: h53H0UYZ015879: Milter: data,
reject=550 5.7.1 Blocked by SpamAssassin
Jun 3 12:00:32 laptop2 sendmail[15879]: h53H0UYZ015879:
to=<address@hidden>, delay=00:00:01, pri=30605,
stat=Blocked by SpamAssassin
Jun 3 12:00:32 laptop2 sendmail[15877]: h53H0Usr015877: to=postmaster,
delay=00:00:01, xdelay=00:00:01, mailer=relay, pri=32087, relay=[127.0.0.1]
[127.0.0.1], dsn=5.0.0, stat=Service unavailable
Jun 3 12:00:32 laptop2 sendmail[15877]: h53H0Usq015877: Losing
./qfh53H0Usq015877: savemail panic
Jun 3 12:00:32 laptop2 sendmail[15877]: h53H0Usq015877: SYSERR(root):
savemail: cannot save rejected email anywhere
Thomas
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ronan Waide" <address@hidden>
To: "Dan Nelson" <address@hidden>
Cc: <address@hidden>
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:58 AM
Subject: Re: Patch 411
> On June 3, address@hidden said:
> > In the last episode (Jun 03), Jason Granat said:
> > > This is something I would like to do, redirect mail tagged as spam to
> > > a specific account. Where can I find this patch and how do I use it?
> >
> > It's at
> >
http://savannah.nongnu.org/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=411&group_id=1083
> >
> > I've just made a bunch of updates to the CVS tree, so this most likely
> > won't apply without manual editing. I'm trying to think of a generic
> > way to handle options like this before committing it. You've got a
> > couple cases:
> >
> > Reject spam (already in the code as -r)
> > Replace all recipients with a single recipient (patch 411)
> > Add a CC to another recipient (say to a global spambox for tracking
> > purposes)
> >
> > Maybe I'll just commit 411 and add another flag for the CC case.
>
> Here's an updated version.
>
> Note, all I've done here is made the patch apply. I've not tested it.
>
> Cheers,
> Waider.
>
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
>
> --
> address@hidden / Yes, it /is/ very personal of me.
>
> "It's a horrible thing to watch, almost like watching an infant tottering
> toward a porcupine." - Kyle Jones on MIS people writing C
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
----
> _______________________________________________
> Spamass-milt-list mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/spamass-milt-list
>
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, (continued)
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Thomas Cameron, 2003/06/03
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Jason Granat, 2003/06/03
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Jason Granat, 2003/06/03
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Nigel Horne, 2003/06/04
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Thomas Cameron, 2003/06/04
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Jason Granat, 2003/06/04
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Chuck Yerkes, 2003/06/04
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Jason Granat, 2003/06/04
- Re: Spamass-milter Redhat Service, Nigel Horne, 2003/06/04
- Re: Patch 411, Ronan Waide, 2003/06/03
- Re: Patch 411,
Thomas Cameron <=
- Re: Patch 411, Jason Granat, 2003/06/03
- Re: Patch 411, Thomas Cameron, 2003/06/03
- Re: Patch 411, Mike Tancsa, 2003/06/04
- Re: Patch 411, Chuck Yerkes, 2003/06/04
- Hangs [ was Re: Patch 411 ], Jeff Jirsa, 2003/06/04
- Re: Hangs [ was Re: Patch 411 ], Dan Nelson, 2003/06/04
- Re: Patch 411, Dan Nelson, 2003/06/04