[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
[Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 19:57:29 +0200 |
Right now, in mainstream Automake, support for silent rules is optional
and activated only if the 'silent-rules' option is specified.
I think the rationale behind this is the that the silent-rules machinery
originally [1] only worked with make implementations supporteing nested
variables expansions, which wasn't a POSIX-specified features, so that
packages wanting to be "extra-portable" couldn't use the silent-rules
support.
But since Automake-NG only targets GNU make, and since silent rules are
disabled by default even when the 'silent-rules' option is given [2], I
think it would now be simpler to have support for silent rules always
enabled [3].
WDYT?
Regards,
Stefano
-*- Notes -*-
[1] At least, until this patch by Paul Eggert:
<http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/automake-patches/2011-12/msg00151.html>
Motivate by automake bugs #9928 and #10237.
[2] Unless the developer makes them enabled by default be calling
"AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])" in configure.ac.
[3] The 'silent-rules' option will thus become a no-op, but it might be kept
for backward-compatibility for a while anyway if you feel that would be
warranted.
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Eric Blake, 2012/04/16
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Jim Meyering, 2012/04/17