[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?
From: |
Dave Hart |
Subject: |
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 18:52:10 +0000 |
On Mon, Apr 16, 2012 at 17:57, Stefano Lattarini
<address@hidden> wrote:
> Right now, in mainstream Automake, support for silent rules is optional
> and activated only if the 'silent-rules' option is specified.
Not so, but in a nitpicking way:
http://www.gnu.org/software/automake/manual/html_node/Automake-silent_002drules-Option.html#Automake-silent_002drules-Option
============
To enable the use of silent-rules in his package, a developer needs to
do either of the following:
Add the silent-rules option as argument to AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE.
Call the AM_SILENT_RULES macro from within the configure.ac file.
============
ntpd uses AM_SILENT_RULES rather than the silent-rules option to
AM_INIT_AUTOMAKE, so I was a bit confused when I could find no mention
of a silent-rules option in our *.ac and *.am sources.
On the meatier, original topic of whether Automake-NG should provide
the end user with silent rules capability in all cases, that's fine by
me. There may be some maintainers who would prefer to force make V=0
to be equivalent to make V=1, but I'm not among them.
Cheers,
Dave Hart
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Eric Blake, 2012/04/16
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Jim Meyering, 2012/04/17