[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?
From: |
Dave Hart |
Subject: |
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally? |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:35:08 +0000 |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:30, Jim Meyering <address@hidden> wrote:
> Stefano Lattarini wrote:
>> But since Automake-NG only targets GNU make, and since silent rules are
>> disabled by default even when the 'silent-rules' option is given [2], I
>> think it would now be simpler to have support for silent rules always
>> enabled [3].
>>
>> WDYT?
>
> Yes, I think that would be an improvement for interactive use,
> but changing the default might be problematic for build systems
> that expect "make" to print a full log of the commands that it runs.
> They'd have to know to use V=1 with an automake-ng-using project.
Re-read what Stefano said carefully. He is not proposing to enable
silence by default, but only to enable the silent-rules infrastructure
by default. make would still default to V=0 absent maintainer
override with AM_SILENT_RULES([yes]).
Cheers,
Dave Hart
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Eric Blake, 2012/04/16
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Jim Meyering, 2012/04/17
- Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?,
Dave Hart <=
- Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Dave Hart, 2012/04/17
- Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/04/17
- Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Jim Meyering, 2012/04/17
- Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/04/17
- Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Stefano Lattarini, 2012/04/19