[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?
From: |
Stefano Lattarini |
Subject: |
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally? |
Date: |
Mon, 16 Apr 2012 20:31:19 +0200 |
Hi Bob.
On 04/16/2012 08:18 PM, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
>
> I think that this is fine as long as the default is for silent-rules to be
> disabled (i.e. verbose)
>
Absolutely, that's not a default I want to change. Also, if a developer wants
to instead have silent rules enabled by default for *his* package, the only
thing he has to do is to add a "AM_SILENT_RULES([yes])" in his configure.ac --
perfectly reasonable IMO.
> and if Automake-ng silently ignores the 'silent-rules' option if it is
> specified so it is possible to switch between portable Automake and
> Automake-ng.
>
Ah, but note that there is no guarantee that an input written for Automake
will continue to work correctly for Automake-NG... although we want to
minimize the incompatibilites and avoid gratuitous breakage, so I agree
with you that is a good idea to keep 'silent-rules' as a no-op but valid
option for the time being.
Thanks,
Stefano
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Eric Blake, 2012/04/16
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Jim Meyering, 2012/04/17