[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?
|
From: |
Dave Hart |
|
Subject: |
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally? |
|
Date: |
Tue, 17 Apr 2012 08:36:10 +0000 |
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 08:35, Dave Hart <address@hidden> wrote:
> Re-read what Stefano said carefully. He is not proposing to enable
> silence by default, but only to enable the silent-rules infrastructure
> by default. make would still default to V=0 absent maintainer
> override with AM_SILENT_RULES([yes]).
Argh. make would still default to V=1 absent override.
Cheers,
Dave Hart
- Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, (continued)
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Dave Hart, 2012/04/16
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Eric Blake, 2012/04/16
Re: [Automake-ng] Activating support for silent-rules unconditionally?, Jim Meyering, 2012/04/17