avrdude-dev
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [avrdude-dev] Include GPIO sysfs patch in next release?


From: Benjamin Henrion
Subject: Re: [avrdude-dev] Include GPIO sysfs patch in next release?
Date: Fri, 11 May 2012 15:10:14 +0200

On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Joerg Wunsch <address@hidden> wrote:
> As Benjamin Henrion wrote:
>
>> Is there any reason why you don't want to include it in your main
>> repo?
>
> There's at least a reason that it's not very generic: it covers only a
> small fraction of the OSes supported by AVRDUDE.

Sure, but that does not mean because it is a minority that it should not go in.

> But the second (and more important) reason for why its priority
> regarding inclusion is rather low: documentation update is left as an
> exercise to the reader.  Of course, in practice, it means it's left as
> an exercise for the maintainer(s). :-(

I will write a blog post on how it works for me.

Right now I have a gentoo ebuild + patch-for-gpio file, it works.

Will push my ebuild to github.

And even a complete binary image of the linux distro so that people
can try it just by flashing a binary on their SD card (for the
beaglebone at least).

>> Could you include it in your next release?
>
> Would someone be willing to add documentation for it?  My main goal
> for AVRDUDE 6.0 is to fix all of the outstanding Xmega issues, and all
> my available resources are tied up with this.

Yes, the gpio enabling requires some commands to enable them, but
that's 4 shell commands to expose the GPIOs in /sys/class/gpio.

> Besides, I wonder whether the --enable-gpio feature would better be
> auto-probed in configure.ac?

Sure, if you do not want to activate that feature in your build, that
should not go in.

-- 
Benjamin Henrion <bhenrion at ffii.org>
FFII Brussels - +32-484-566109 - +32-2-3500762
"In July 2005, after several failed attempts to legalise software
patents in Europe, the patent establishment changed its strategy.
Instead of explicitly seeking to sanction the patentability of
software, they are now seeking to create a central European patent
court, which would establish and enforce patentability rules in their
favor, without any possibility of correction by competing courts or
democratically elected legislators."



reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]