[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?] |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 16:51:39 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
Hi John,
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:22:35 -0400 John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Felix scripsit:
>
>> If you haven't already: this is the chance to give it a final test
>> before we wrap it up. Regardless of platform, no matter what OS.
>
> On Cygwin, "make check" reports several problems. I did exactly
> the same build and test on Linux (Ubuntu Lucid on the CoLinux kernel
> 2.6.33.7-co-0.7.9) with no problems at all. (I used 4.7.5 (rev 44c2f63)
> as the boot chicken on Cygwin vs. 4.7.5 (rev 0e44970) on Linux.)
If I understand correctly, you tried the git code (since you had to
bootstrap) not the rc tarball, right? Not that this is a problem (not
at all) -- it's just to understand what you are running.
> I get 23 instances of "[panic] nursery is too small - try higher setting
> using the `-:s' option - execution terminated" in the Cygwin stderr log,
> which I have attached. I commented out the "set -e" in runtests.sh so
> the whole test suite would run to completion. There are no such panics
> in the Linux stderr log.
>
> I haven't tested exhaustively, but the first two panics result from
> interpreter runs on apply-test.scm and library-test.scm. If I add -:s2M
> here and rerun csi with the same arguments, it runs much longer and then
> I get the same error.
I think http://bugs.call-cc.org/ticket/738 is related.
Best wishes.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario