[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
From: |
Mario Domenech Goulart |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?] |
Date: |
Sat, 08 Sep 2012 19:47:07 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) |
Hi John,
On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:35:06 -0400 John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
> Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit:
>
>> If I understand correctly, you tried the git code (since you had to
>> bootstrap) not the rc tarball, right? Not that this is a problem (not
>> at all) -- it's just to understand what you are running.
>
> No, I tried the rc tarball. My existing installed version is 4.7.5
> (rev 44c2f63).
You don't actually need an installed chicken to build the rc tarball.
The tarball contains the C files already. Bootstrapping doesn't hurt
usually, unless your installed chicken is buggy. :-)
Best wishes.
Mario
--
http://parenteses.org/mario
- [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/11