[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
From: |
Felix |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?] |
Date: |
Sun, 09 Sep 2012 15:19:49 +0200 (CEST) |
From: Mario Domenech Goulart <address@hidden>
Subject: Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
Date: Sun, 09 Sep 2012 09:04:21 -0400
> Hi John,
>
> On Sat, 8 Sep 2012 15:22:35 -0400 John Cowan <address@hidden> wrote:
>
>> I get 23 instances of "[panic] nursery is too small - try higher setting
>> using the `-:s' option - execution terminated" in the Cygwin stderr log,
>> which I have attached. I commented out the "set -e" in runtests.sh so
>> the whole test suite would run to completion. There are no such panics
>> in the Linux stderr log.
>>
>> I haven't tested exhaustively, but the first two panics result from
>> interpreter runs on apply-test.scm and library-test.scm. If I add -:s2M
>> here and rerun csi with the same arguments, it runs much longer and then
>> I get the same error.
>
> Does make check work for you if you apply the attached patch?
>
> I can't run the full make check to completion because I'm running out of
> disk space, but some tests that were failing don't fail with that
> change.
Does that mean no tests fail up to the point where the disk is full
or some do and some don't?
cheers,
felix
- [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?],
Felix <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/11