[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?]
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?] |
Date: |
Sat, 8 Sep 2012 19:35:06 -0400 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Mario Domenech Goulart scripsit:
> If I understand correctly, you tried the git code (since you had to
> bootstrap) not the rc tarball, right? Not that this is a problem (not
> at all) -- it's just to understand what you are running.
No, I tried the rc tarball. My existing installed version is 4.7.5
(rev 44c2f63).
--
Híggledy-pìggledy / XML programmers John Cowan
Try to escape those / I-eighteen-N woes; http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Incontrovertibly / What we need more of is address@hidden
Unicode weenies and / François Yergeaus.
- [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/08
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?],
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Mario Domenech Goulart, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/09
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], Felix, 2012/09/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] address@hidden: Re: 4.8.0 release?], John Cowan, 2012/09/11