[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules |
Date: |
Sat, 10 Nov 2012 21:37:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Alex Shinn scripsit:
> A less ugly approach is to have a special module prefix
> (chicken <X>) which refers to the <X> egg, e.g. (chicken sqlite3)
> refers to the sqlite3 egg.
That would need to be augmented by a mapping method in the other
direction: for example, a Chicken module could import an R7RS library
(foo bar) as r7rs-foo-bar.
But I still think the approach (foo bar) <=> foo-bar, though slightly
imperfect in both directions, is the best overall compromise.
--
John Cowan address@hidden http://ccil.org/~cowan
Nobody expects the RESTifarian Inquisition! Our chief weapon is
surprise ... surprise and tedium ... tedium and surprise ....
Our two weapons are tedium and surprise ... and ruthless disregard
for unpleasant facts.... Our three weapons are tedium, surprise, and
ruthless disregard ... and an almost fanatical devotion to Roy Fielding....
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Felix, 2012/11/11
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Alex Shinn, 2012/11/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules,
John Cowan <=
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Peter Bex, 2012/11/11