[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules
From: |
John Cowan |
Subject: |
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules |
Date: |
Mon, 12 Nov 2012 14:18:32 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) |
Peter Bex scripsit:
> If you're having trouble with that, "you're doing it completely wrong"(TM).
> In that case, there are more serious issues to consider, like command
> injection vulnerabilities. Only when the user is dealing with these files
> directly could this even remotely be a consideration.
Fair enough. But the fact that # has internal meaning already still leads
me to propose _ as a less brittle solution.
--
But you, Wormtongue, you have done what you could for your true master. Some
reward you have earned at least. Yet Saruman is apt to overlook his bargains.
I should advise you to go quickly and remind him, lest he forget your faithful
service. --Gandalf John Cowan <address@hidden>
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, (continued)
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Alex Shinn, 2012/11/10
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Felix, 2012/11/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Ivan Raikov, 2012/11/11
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Peter Bex, 2012/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, John Cowan, 2012/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Peter Bex, 2012/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules,
John Cowan <=
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Felix, 2012/11/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, John Cowan, 2012/11/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Alex Shinn, 2012/11/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Alex Shinn, 2012/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Peter Bex, 2012/11/12
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Felix, 2012/11/13
- Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Alex Shinn, 2012/11/13
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Felix, 2012/11/11
Re: [Chicken-hackers] r7rs modules, Alex Shinn, 2012/11/10