Re: [DotGNU]transaction logging and roll-back

[Myrddian]

Ok, this might sound cheap but why dont we attempt to make transactions atomic?
I was thinking of a Journaling solutions (akin to that of Journaling File 
Systems)
Each transaction has a unique ID, now for some odd reason the transaction is not
fulfilled, because its stored in a log and marked active the server will re-try
to fulfill this transaction, until it's sucesfull (ie: it got a reply)

This means that replies from server-server can be considered a transaction, 
it also means it becomes easy to update tranasctions, not to mention
implement roll-backs a lot easier.





__________________________________________
Myrddian <address@hidden(nospam)au>
-------------------------------------------
"I stayed up all night playing poker with tarot cards. I got a full house
 and four people died". 

                   -- Steven Wright