[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU] Ada95 (was Inferno Papers)
From: |
Rhys Weatherley |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU] Ada95 (was Inferno Papers) |
Date: |
Sun, 10 Mar 2002 11:35:17 +1000 |
Hans-Olof Danielsson wrote:
> It'd be interesting to know how large chunk of the cscc
> code could be reused to implement Ada95 and
> how long time it'd take. For info on Ada see e.g.
> www.AdaPower.com .
It would probably take quite a while. A lot of the
backend code generation stuff could be reused.
The hardest part would be the front-end parser and
semantic analysis routines, together with the issue
of defining a mapping from Ada types to CTS. Ada
is a pretty big language.
I'm pretty sure I wouldn't want to bite this off, but
if someone else wants to take it on, that would be
great.
Cheers,
Rhys.
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/03/06
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Hans-Olof Danielsson, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Gopal.V, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Chris Smith, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Jonathan P Springer, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Michael Khaw, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, John, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/07
- Message not available
- Re: [DotGNU] Ada95 (was Inferno Papers),
Rhys Weatherley <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/07
- Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Tim TerlegÄrd, 2002/03/07
Re: [DotGNU]Inferno Papers, Bill Lance, 2002/03/06