Re: [DotGNU]Licence question about GNU and GCC

[Gopal.V]

If memory serves me right, Norbert Bollow wrote:
> C and C++ are for language reasons very difficult to
> compile to verifiable bytecode, and this is a problem
> that we can't get around by starting from an AST instead
> of starting from source code.
        IL has "unmanaged" support for C++ stuff. And by starting 
from an AST , I think we can really bring about our agenda of 
one codegen for all. Also think about how this will affect GCJ
and similar stuff.

        The point is why work on a parser/lexer when you can get
the AST as such.
-- 
 The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
 //===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
 \\===<=>===//