[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet |
Date: |
Thu, 21 Mar 2002 00:01:17 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > Still it is possible that at some stage Mono will see
> > a _good_technical_reason_ to use something that Rhys has
> > designed, and decide to use it.
>
> For example, ilasm.
A better example would be the verfication code.
and their JIT is gpl'd too -- license no object.
I think that Rhys is the guy to take the decision,
afterall he was the guy who wrote it.
Gopal.V
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Adam Treat, 2002/03/17
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Paolo Molaro, 2002/03/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Gopal.V, 2002/03/18
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/20
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Fergus Henderson, 2002/03/20
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet,
Gopal.V <=
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Rodrigo Moya, 2002/03/20
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Gopal.V, 2002/03/21
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/22
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, James Michael DuPont, 2002/03/20
- Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Norbert Bollow, 2002/03/20
Re: [DotGNU]Call for a truce over mono vs pnet, Adam Treat, 2002/03/17