[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[Do
From: |
Gopal.V |
Subject: |
Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)) |
Date: |
Mon, 25 Mar 2002 17:43:46 +0530 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.2.5i |
If memory serves me right, Rhys Weatherley wrote:
>
> There's really no incentive for MS to turn Rotor into a
> real system that can run arbitrary .NET applications.
> For example, if Rotor on FreeBSD ever became capable
> of running ASP.NET, then it would be a threat to
> Windows NT server sales. The MS marketing
> department will shoot that in the head real quick.
This is just a gesture to show that "We are not a
windows centric monopoly, look we're supporting .NET on
FreeBSD...."
Nothing beyond it , but M$ can use it to taint uni's
in the bargain . So let's try to get such ui's to help
us before M$ buys them out.
Gopal.V
--
The difference between insanity and genius is only measured by success
//===<=>===\\
|| GNU RULEZ ||
\\===<=>===//
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), (continued)
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), John, 2002/03/24
- Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (wasRe:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Seth Johnson, 2002/03/24
- AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Tim TerlegÄrd, 2002/03/25
- AW: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Carsten Kuckuk, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Gopal.V, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)),
Gopal.V <=
- payback time for MS & BSD...or, this subject line is getting too long (was Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))), S11001001, 2002/03/25
- [DotGNU]Re: payback time for MS & BSD, Daniel Carrera, 2002/03/25
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: payback time for MS & BSD, Rhys Weatherley, 2002/03/25
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: payback time for MS & BSD, Daniel Carrera, 2002/03/25
- Re: AW: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re:[DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables)), Barry Fitzgerald, 2002/03/25
- that's one less FUD (was Re: this affects DotGNU (was: this doesn't affect DotGNU (was Re: [DotGNU]New addendum for MS redistributables))), S11001001, 2002/03/25