[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business
From: |
Norbert Bollow |
Subject: |
Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business |
Date: |
Thu, 11 Jul 2002 11:46:23 +0200 |
Boris Kolar <address@hidden> wrote:
> I think a good business model is essential to success.
I agree 100%.
> > Here are the three main goals of the DotGNU project:
>
> One of the important goals should be to provide
> interoperability between java and .net.
Yes, that's one of the goals of DotGNU.
> > working on Free Software. I have plans for starting an
> > organisation which can replace FreeDevelopers in this respect.)
>
> Great! Commercial aspects are cruical to success, as we have
> all seen so many times. I was thinking in this direction:
>
> Let's introduce a new license (with RMS's blessing, I hope),
> that is free and compatible with GPL (I call it CGPL,
> C=Commercial, for now). With addition that users ("members" of
> free software community) would have to contribute at least 1%
> of their income (or nothing if their income is too low) to
Intoducing any requirement for paying money would make it
incompatible with GPL.
> salaries are not checked, so it's purely a moral obligation
You are of course free to start a membership organisation for
everyone who agrees that there is a moral obligation to donate
1% of one's income to further Free Software development. This
doesn't even require getting into the huge practical problems
of introducing a software license of the type you propose.
Greetings, Norbert.
--
A founder of the http://DotGNU.org project and Steering Committee member
Norbert Bollow, Weidlistr.18, CH-8624 Gruet (near Zurich, Switzerland)
Tel +41 1 972 20 59 Fax +41 1 972 20 69 http://norbert.ch
List hosting with GNU Mailman on your own domain name http://cisto.com
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), (continued)
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/16
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/17
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), David Bradley, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe: User Interfaces), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]flexible for users, or flexible for developers? (wasRe:User Interfaces), David Bradley, 2002/07/09
- [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business, Boris Kolar, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]DotGNU and business,
Norbert Bollow <=
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Timothy Rue, 2002/07/09
- Re: [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, D.I.Freeman, 2002/07/09
- [DotGNU]freedom and the "quality of [GNU/]Linux" (was Re: DotGNU and business), S11001001, 2002/07/10
- [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Peter Minten, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/11
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Timothy Rue, 2002/07/15
- Re: [DotGNU]Protection from legal harassment (was Re: DotGNU and business), Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/15
- [DotGNU]Re: DotGNU and business, Norbert Bollow, 2002/07/11