[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: A modern-mode?
From: |
Alfred M. Szmidt |
Subject: |
Re: A modern-mode? |
Date: |
Wed, 16 Sep 2020 03:36:12 -0400 |
The word modern has a negative meaning in that it implies that the
rest of Emacs isn't modern -- why would users ever want to switch of
"modern-mode" and use the un-modern Emacs?
As this is meant to be an help for new starters we should feel free to
improve these from release to release without a negative impact on old
new starters, as by definition they are not anymore new starters :)
ever-changing-mode? :)
- Re: A modern-mode?, (continued)
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/15
- Re: A modern-mode?, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/15
- Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/15
- Re: A modern-mode?, Gregory Heytings, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, João Távora, 2020/09/16
- Re: A modern-mode?, Arthur Miller, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Richard Stallman, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Göktuğ Kayaalp, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Alfred M. Szmidt, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Eli Zaretskii, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Andrea Corallo, 2020/09/16
Re: A modern-mode?, Dmitry Gutov, 2020/09/16