[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures
From: |
Camm Maguire |
Subject: |
Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures |
Date: |
29 Nov 2004 16:48:55 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 |
Greetings! Once again, can't tell you how valuable this exchange is.
Ball is again in your court. Again, survived 2k/1000 random tester
iterations for me, but of course this is not definitive. That said,
this mod wa very simple -- I had obviously forgotten to separate the
bindings by cons arguments.
Take care,
"Paul F. Dietz" <address@hidden> writes:
> Camm Maguire wrote:
> > Thanks! OK, a retreat to a yet more conservative position. What is
> > committed now passed 2k random-tester iterations for me.
>
> But not, unfortunately, for me:
>
> Test MISC.453 failed
> Form: (funcall (compile nil
> '(lambda (a) (* a (setf a 2) a (identity 5))))
> 3)
> Expected value: 60
> Actual value: 90.
>
> I have some local changes to my copy of the random tester that may be
> improving its detection rate. I can probably boost it more by making
> SETQ/F and n-ary arithmetic operators more likely.
>
> Paul
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Gcl-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gcl-devel
>
>
>
--
Camm Maguire address@hidden
==========================================================================
"The earth is but one country, and mankind its citizens." -- Baha'u'llah
- [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/26
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/27
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/28
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures,
Camm Maguire <=
- Message not available
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- RE: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Mike Thomas, 2004/11/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/29
- Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Paul F. Dietz, 2004/11/30
Re: [Gcl-devel] New random tester failures, Camm Maguire, 2004/11/27