gluster-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-hea


From: Dr Rodney G. McDuff
Subject: Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal
Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 18:05:22 +1000
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.5.0.14 (Windows/20071210)

Could someone publish a example server-side afr setup (perhaps on the
wiki) just to see how the server and client vols hang together.


Amar S. Tumballi wrote:
>>> Would doing server
>>>  side afr be faster for this process?
>>>       
>> Server will still have to replicate so there should not be any difference.
>>
>>     
>
>
>   
>>>  Or just go with the data having to be copied over the network twice
>>>  (if this is how it works)
>>>       
>> I could not understand this...
>>
>>     
>
>
> Krishna,  my understanding is, Brandon is referring to server side afr,
> where you have one subvolume as posix, (ie, no network call), so data is not
> transfered on the wire. so it can be faster right?
>
> Regards,
>
>   


-- 
Dr. Rodney G. McDuff                 |Ex ignorantia ad sapientiam
Manager, Strategic Technologies Group|    Ex luce ad tenebras
Information Technology Services      |
The University of Queensland         |
EMAIL: address@hidden          |
TELEPHONE: +61 7 3365 8220           |





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]