[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-hea
From: |
Amar S. Tumballi |
Subject: |
Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal |
Date: |
Thu, 1 May 2008 10:58:01 -0700 |
On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 10:46 AM, Brandon Lamb <address@hidden> wrote:
> So in my case where i have one directory with existing data and
> another that is empty, should i set the trusted version to 1 on the
> pre existing data and 3 on the empty directory? Or am I totally
> missing what this does?
>
Nope, you are wrong here. In this case, you should set 3 on directory with
pre existing data, and 1 on empty directory. That should work fine.
The idea is, the version with higher value gets replicated to the other
subvolumes, hence if you are starting fresh, then you should give higher
value to the directory which you want to be replicated.
Regards,
--
Amar Tumballi
Gluster/GlusterFS Hacker
[bulde on #gluster/irc.gnu.org]
http://www.zresearch.com - Commoditizing Super Storage!
- [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Brandon Lamb, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Krishna Srinivas, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Amar S. Tumballi, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Dr Rodney G. McDuff, 2008/05/01
- Message not available
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Amar S. Tumballi, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Krishna Srinivas, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Brandon Lamb, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal,
Amar S. Tumballi <=
- RE: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Christopher Hawkins, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Amar S. Tumballi, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Brandon Lamb, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Krishna Srinivas, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Brandon Lamb, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Krishna Srinivas, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Brandon Lamb, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Brandon Lamb, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Gordan Bobic, 2008/05/01
- Re: [Gluster-devel] Client side afr versus server side, doing a self-heal, Brandon Lamb, 2008/05/01