[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] need assessment from fellow clinicians
From: |
Karsten Hilbert |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] need assessment from fellow clinicians |
Date: |
Fri, 9 Jul 2004 23:36:16 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.3.22.1i |
> > Once an episode has led to a medically well-founded diagnoses
> > the most recent AOE is likely to contain the diagnosis text.
> > So they will automatically appear as aPs, perhaps labelled
> > permanently relevant.
>
> Do we thus avoid having to code things specially to be "problems", i.e.
> by just having them declared programmatically as any AOE (in fact -->
> any clin_narrative row) that has had a diagnosis coded?
Hm, currently any soap item can have codes associated with it.
Any soAp item can be a diagnosis and it can be marked is_aoe.
If I understand you correctly, yes, we can avoid having to
mark things as "active problems" since we would simply draw
the problem list from the AOE rows, alternatively soAp where
is_diag, alternatively RFE.
> "Other" problems can include those carried into the practice or, as
> Elizabeth pointed out, later input retroactively, as Past History.
Those can be entered as clin_narrative rows where soap_cat='a'
and marked is_diag (this isn't really a flag but rather
whether or not there's a link from the clin_diag table).
> I am wondering how the data structure can best be helped to assemble
> these pieces into manageable views,
Well, look at the current schema and tell us :)
> which might be difficult if the
> data is distributed across multiple tables.
Nah, that shouldn't trouble us all too much.
> Does that mean that the mechanism of entry of all clinical data - past
> history, allergies, family history - will be through clinical narrative
> rows?
No, why ? Just because we store most of them in clin_narrative
doesn't mean we can't have diverse input widgets. Also,
allergies and vaccinations already have their widgets.
> Does it also mean in the example that if no diagnosis is being coded,
> we need a way to make the Soap line "permanently relevant" so that the
> programmatic definition of a problem is expanded to include any
> clin_narrative (including AOE) rows marked Permanently relevant?
Selection of aP would go like this: AOE or soAp where is_diag
or RFE.
Karsten
--
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD 4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] need assessment from fellow clinicians, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/07/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] need assessment from fellow clinicians, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/07/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] need assessment from fellow clinicians, Jim Busser, 2004/07/01
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] need assessment from fellow clinicians, Jim Busser, 2004/07/02
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] need assessment from fellow clinicians, Jim Busser, 2004/07/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] need assessment from fellow clinicians,
Karsten Hilbert <=
- [Gnumed-devel] examining current schemas, Jim Busser, 2004/07/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] examining current schemas, Ian Haywood, 2004/07/09
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] examining current schemas, Karsten Hilbert, 2004/07/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] examining current schemas, Jim Busser, 2004/07/11
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] examining current schemas, Ian Haywood, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] examining current schemas, Jim Busser, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] examining current schemas, Horst Herb, 2004/07/12
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] examining current schemas, Horst Herb, 2004/07/12