Re: [Gnumed-devel] Gui of Interim new gmDemographics.py

[Karsten Hilbert]

Jim,

is there any reason why we this gets posted so many times ?

Karsten

On Wed, Jul 28, 2004 at 02:20:28PM -0700, J Busser wrote:
> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.618)
> 
> On Jul 27, 2004, at 3:12 AM, Richard Terry wrote:
> >Complaints/suggestions please.
> 
> In the "Contact details" section, in place of the hard-coded labels 
> like Home Phone, we should instead display pairs of values (id_type 
> reference and the "url" i.e. the phone number) drawn from the 
> comm_channel table. A method by which to choose or manage a sort-order 
> for any individual's values is not yet clear. The no-brainer may be to 
> just alpha-sort those that are available:
> 
> email
> fax
> home_phone
> mobile
> web
> work_phone
> 
> The above would also support more than one number of any one type (e.g. 
> if a patient has two homes or places of work), whereas what was shown 
> in the .png would require the id_type values to be parsed and could get 
> messy across languages and even variations in spelling. I do agree it 
> would be usual for Home and Work to be presented as a pair, and 
> probably desirable. A sort order could be added to the enum-comm-types 
> table and would permit designating:
> 1. home_phone
> 2. work_phone
> 3. mobile
> 4. fax
> 5. email
> 6. web
> 
> the user would see whatever was in the database; empty values would be 
> irrelevant to display:
> 
> home_phone (value)
> home_phone (value)
> work_phone (value)
> 
> in the schema we have lnk_identity2comm_chan and lnk_person_org_address 
> and lnk_org2comm_chan but I gather there is no link of individuals to 
> phone numbers _at_  an organization, i.e. phone numbers are entered 
> independently for individuals and organizations? If that is correct 
> then there is no relevance to displaying, on the demographic screen, a 
> phone number for the organization at which a patient works?
> 
> >Don't really know what to call the entitlement cards section (see gui- 
> >not
> >completed)
> 
> I have seen "Financially Responsible Agency (FRA) #" used. As patients 
> will vary in some of the applicable FRAs, an abbreviation for the FRA 
> may be necessary to display alongside. Would we want a sort-order 
> scheme for the entitlement card section something like what I described 
> for contact details?
> 
> 
> Jim Busser
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Gnumed-devel mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/gnumed-devel

-- 
GPG key ID E4071346 @ wwwkeys.pgp.net
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346