[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: FreeDiams freediams_0.4.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTE
From: |
Andreas Tille |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: FreeDiams freediams_0.4.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into Debian |
Date: |
Thu, 15 Jul 2010 08:47:27 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17) |
On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 07:26:22AM +0200, Sebastian Hilbert wrote:
>
> Unless FreeDiams 0.4.2 is seriously broken and you don't want it in stable at
> all I would not worry too much. It is an illusion to get the right version
> into stable. You will be coming up with so many versions that you will alway
> whish that one should have made it into stable. A lot of users will have the
> testing tepository enabled.
>
> And one can always have a stable base and additional packages from testing.
>
> I would not worry too much.
Yes.
> All you need (currently) is the line for debian testing
> It depends on your bases system (lenny == current stable or testing/sqeeze ==
> future stable)
You can find it at
http://wiki.gnumed.de/bin/view/Gnumed/DebianGuideLong
Section "Configuring and Managing Debian". The pinning stuff is extremely
important because if you do not define it in /etc/apt/prferences and add
testing or unstable to your sources.list you will end up with a complete
testing or unstable system after your next upgrade.
Kind regards
Andreas.
--
http://fam-tille.de
- [Gnumed-devel] Re: FreeDiams freediams_0.4.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into Debian, (continued)
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: FreeDiams freediams_0.4.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into Debian, Sebastian Hilbert, 2010/07/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Re: FreeDiams freediams_0.4.2-1_amd64.changes ACCEPTED into Debian,
Andreas Tille <=