[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the G
From: |
Jim Busser |
Subject: |
Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message |
Date: |
Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:24:07 -0700 |
On 2010-08-17, at 2:12 PM, Jim Busser wrote:
> this second scenario especially seems to make the case for logical,
> computational, and clinical legitimacy to keep OBR and OBX meaningfully
> associated?
I came across a different use case of
one OBR
multiple identical OBX
where a "single test (protocol)" involves the patient bringing into the lab 3
chemically-treated, self-sealing "cards" each of which contains a smudge of the
person's feces (yes, that's "bowel movement") applied using a wooden applicator
stick... yuk)
Anyway this is referred to as a test for "occult blood" and may be returned as
OBR-Occult Blood
OBX1-Occult Blood1
OBX2-Occult Blood2
OBX3-Occult Blood3
which would seem to make the case that each OBX be imported as its own row
(could the subid be stored in GNUmed as a subfield within our test_reult fk?)
-- Jim
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, (continued)
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Jim Busser, 2010/08/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Jim Busser, 2010/08/17
- Message not available
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Jim Busser, 2010/08/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message,
Jim Busser <=
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2010/08/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Jim Busser, 2010/08/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/08/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Rogerio Luz Coelho, 2010/08/20
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/18
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/08/29
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/08/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Luke Kenneth Casson Leighton, 2010/08/15
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/08/17
- Re: [Gnumed-devel] Matching was Re: Mirth (2 of 3): HL7 import for the GNUmed project - test source message, Karsten Hilbert, 2010/08/15