gnumed-devel
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !


From: Rogerio Luz Coelho
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] clinicians: coding use case survey - please respond !
Date: Wed, 4 May 2011 17:46:35 -0300



2011/5/4 Karsten Hilbert <address@hidden>
On Wed, May 04, 2011 at 03:10:53PM -0300, Rogerio Luz wrote:

> > On Tue, May 03, 2011 at 10:04:56PM -0300, Rogerio Luz wrote:
> >
> > > > with the groundwork for coding now in place please respond
> > > > to the following scenarios (don't worry about the medical
> > > > sanity):
> > > >
> > > >        (remove either "yes" or "no", maybe add a comment)
> > > >
> > > > #--------------------------------------------------------
> > > > Patient has episode "URTI" coded to an appropriate ICD code.
> > > > Doctor changes episode description to "hypertension".
> > > >
> > > > I would expect the previously linked ICD codes of "URTI" to
> > > > not any longer be linked to this episode:
> > > >
> > > >        no
> > > >        comment
> > > >
> > >
> > > I would expect that a new code was ADDED to this episode, old code should
> > > still appear as in ICD 10 terms
> > >
> > > N390 + I10
> >
> > Just so I get this right:
> >
> > When you rename an episode (or issue) from "Diabetes type 2,
> > insulin dependant" to "Hypertension" you *do* want to have
> > the Diabetes codes stick with the now-Hypertension episode ?
> >
> > (Don't worry *why* someone would do such renaming.)
>
> When does this renaming take effect?  For now *yes* I would like to be stuck
> with that code, if it was not put there by mistake.

That ("by mistake") GNUmed cannot know (as Jim said) and
should not second guess (as you said).

Then leave it :) 

With the right privelages it can be fixed by dbo right?

Rogerio


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]