[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Gnumed-devel] 1.4.9 inability to select unsigned results to sign

From: Karsten Hilbert
Subject: Re: [Gnumed-devel] 1.4.9 inability to select unsigned results to sign
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 13:45:30 +0100
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)

On Fri, Dec 12, 2014 at 12:42:26AM +0100, Karsten Hilbert wrote:

> > >> You do know the workarounds to get things done ?
> > > 
> > > Does this question need answering in light of the above ?
> > 
> > The inbox continues to detect and inform about such values needing signing 
> > and as I recall takes the user to the plugin.
> > 
> > Presently, my only measurements are those that I myself input, and so I can 
> > visually detect such unsigned entries without too much difficulty.
> > 
> > But in the case where such measurements could be harder to find, what other 
> > workarounds exist?
> There is currently no good workaround for _finding_ the
> values to review in mixed multi-cells - which don't get
> selected via "select unreviewed", and which may be hard to
> find for manual selection - short of checking the grid
> manually or browsing the list of measurements.

I have now added the review status to the start of the
"Comment" column of the measurements list view such that the
list can be sorted on that column thereby grouping together
test results by their respective stati

        - reviewed
        - not reviewed (at all)
        - not reviewed by you (if you are the intended reviewer = responsible)

(IOW, tests reviewed by anyone other than yourself for which
your are NOT marked as responsible will be flagged as

That'll make few-and-far-between results lacking reviews much
easier to find.

GPG key ID E4071346 @
E167 67FD A291 2BEA 73BD  4537 78B9 A9F9 E407 1346

Attachment: screenshot_001.png
Description: PNG image

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]