[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: STS Template Engine
From: |
Stefan Urbanek |
Subject: |
Re: STS Template Engine |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jul 2005 08:37:57 +0200 |
User-agent: |
Internet Messaging Program (IMP) 3.2.2 |
Citát Helge Hess <address@hidden>:
> On 25. Jul 2005, at 02:35 Uhr, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote:
> >> Well, my first thought was: why another templating engine? We
> >> already have WO (either in SOPE or in gstep-web).
> > maybe because WO would be overkill for some simple tasks (or do you
> > use a semitrailer truck to carry a crate of beer to your home)?
>
> Hear hear! ;-)
>
> The WO framework just has ~20 public classes and is hardely a truck,
> its rather a beautifully modular bike:
> http://developer.apple.com/documentation/LegacyTechnologies/
> WebObjects/WebObjects_4.5/System/Library/Frameworks/
> WebObjects.framework/ObjC_classic/WebObjectsTOC.html
>
What about WO dependencies? ...
> Stripping down to the classes required for templating you may end up
> with something like 5-10 classes for text rendering.
>
"stripping down ..." does not seem like out-of-the-box solution...
Nothing against WO - each tool has its purpose...
Regards,
Stefan Urbanek
--
http://stefan.agentfarms.net
First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they fight you, then
you win.
- Mahatma Gandhi
Re: STS Template Engine, Manuel Guesdon, 2005/07/25