|
From: | Helge Hess |
Subject: | Re: Checking breakage of backward compatibility |
Date: | Thu, 5 Oct 2006 13:43:03 +0200 |
On Oct 5, 2006, at 12:45, Richard Frith-Macdonald wrote:
On 4 Oct 2006, at 12:46, David Ayers wrote:I'm almost indifferent on the subject. But in practice I believe peopleThat worries me too ... but I think we *must* try to be strict about it.will unknowingly break binary compatibility and forget to bump the SOname. I think this is worse than forcing folks to recompile apps justbecause the SO name bumped even though it didn't break binary compatibility.... but like I said. I wouldn't mind either way.
I don't think it will work to enforce being strict about this on all developers (same for other non-hack stuff, like documentation). Its too much work and slows down development because you can't concentrate on the actual thing you want to do.
So in my model we would just bump the soname before/after each alpha release. Or possibly even keep it the same because it has little practical value for alpha anyways, no special preferences here.
Writing an automated testsuite (which would also need to be maintained) is IMHO a waste of efforts.
Greets, Helge -- Helge Hess http://docs.opengroupware.org/Members/helge/
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |