[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: code completion
From: |
Óscar Fuentes |
Subject: |
Re: code completion |
Date: |
Wed, 12 Mar 2008 22:40:06 +0100 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (windows-nt) |
Pascal Bourguignon <pjb@informatimago.com> writes:
>>> 1) Parsing speed -- Parsing in elisp is sloooow for large files. Maybe we
>>> need a real semantic-parser written in C or some other fast language.
>>
>> This looks like a good candidate:
>>
>> http://www.gccxml.org/
>
> Will parsing of xml be faster in elisp than parsing C?
Last time I checked, gccxml didn't need a full XML parser.
Anyways, parsing XML is faster and *simpler* than parsing C++ (and
parsing gccxml output may be faster and simpler than parsing C too).
--
Oscar
- Re: code completion, (continued)
Re: code completion, Richard G Riley, 2008/03/11
Message not availableRe: code completion, Arne Schmitz, 2008/03/12
Re: code completion, Óscar Fuentes, 2008/03/12
Message not availableRe: code completion, Pascal Bourguignon, 2008/03/12
Re: code completion,
Óscar Fuentes <=
Re: code completion, Tom Tromey, 2008/03/12
Re: code completion, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/12
Re: code completion, Tom Tromey, 2008/03/12
Re: code completion, Lennart Borgman (gmail), 2008/03/12
Re: code completion, Jason Rumney, 2008/03/12
Re: code completion, Óscar Fuentes, 2008/03/12
Message not available
Re: code completion, Bastien Guerry, 2008/03/12