[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22
From: |
Jason Rumney |
Subject: |
Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22 |
Date: |
Wed, 08 Dec 2010 15:32:51 -0000 |
User-agent: |
G2/1.0 |
On Oct 21, 9:25 pm, Ralf Fassel <ralf...@gmx.de> wrote:
> However, a different, larger (800+kB) file which is also supposed to be
> latin-1 displays as "t:--- file", and the single-byte Umlauts are
> displayed as octal. How can I find out why emacs loads this file in 't'
> instead of '1'? A quick search shows only doubled umlauts such as
> 'Grüße' or öö, but if I add these to foo.txt, emacs still loads foo.txt
> as "1:".
Was the file edited on Windows? Does it contain euro signs,
"smartquotes" or other non-standard Microsoft additions to Latin-1?
If this is the answer to your problem, then the following should help
(but probably breaks auto-detection of utf-8 files).
(prefer-coding-system 'windows-1252)
- word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Jason Rumney, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22,
Jason Rumney <=
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ilya Zakharevich, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Stefan Monnier, 2010/12/08
- Re: word syntax/umlauts emacs 23 vs 22, Ralf Fassel, 2010/12/09