[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: Issues with emacs
From: |
Ludwig, Mark |
Subject: |
RE: Issues with emacs |
Date: |
Tue, 26 Jun 2012 19:49:00 +0000 |
> From: notbob
> Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2012 2:28 PM
> To: help-gnu-emacs@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Issues with emacs
>
> I realize emacs would be much more useful if I was a programmer,
> particularly a lisp programmer, but I'm not.
This summarizes the split among the Emacs user community that I see in this
discussion thread. Those of us who are programmer types are probably a lot
happier with Emacs as it is (and as it has been since its start many decades
ago) than those who aren't programmer types. Partly it's mindset, but also
gets to depth of knowledge about how to use the tool -- and how to change what
it does/how it works.
Regarding bloat, an analogy: if all you ever need is one specific knife blade,
a Swiss Army Knife will seem to have a lot of bloat.
Cheers,
Mark
- Re: Issues with emacs, (continued)
- Message not available
- Re: Issues with emacs, notbob, 2012/06/26
- Re: Issues with emacs, Dustin Hemmerling, 2012/06/26
- Re: Issues with emacs, Sivaram Neelakantan, 2012/06/26
- Re: Issues with emacs, Richard Riley, 2012/06/26
- Re: Issues with emacs, Tom, 2012/06/28
- Message not available
- Re: Issues with emacs, notbob, 2012/06/26
- RE: Issues with emacs,
Ludwig, Mark <=
- Re: Issues with emacs, Pascal J. Bourguignon, 2012/06/26
- Re: Issues with emacs, PJ Weisberg, 2012/06/27
- Re: Issues with emacs, John Wiegley, 2012/06/27
- Message not available
- Re: Issues with emacs, notbob, 2012/06/26
- Re: Issues with emacs, John Wiegley, 2012/06/26
- re: temacs, Jambunathan K, 2012/06/27
- Re: temacs, Ken Goldman, 2012/06/27
- Re: temacs, John Wiegley, 2012/06/27
- Re: temacs, Bastien, 2012/06/28
- Re: temacs, Ken Goldman, 2012/06/29