re: temacs

[Jambunathan K]

"John Wiegley" <johnw@newartisans.com> writes:

> If you built and ran only "temacs" (which gets built when you "make" in the
> Emacs build tree), I think that would satisfy every desire you ever had for
> Emacs to be simple -- to a fault.

ISTM there is a perceived need for emacs-lite - may be temacs would be
the right candidate.  Can temacs be distributed as a binary for various
platforms.

For git commits, rebases etc I use jemacs as EDITOR.  Can I use temacs
for such simple editing jobs?

What would the faults be?
--