[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users
From: |
Francis Belliveau |
Subject: |
Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2021 19:52:18 -0500 |
I have had it actually "exit" on me when I didn't want it to.
That's what I call dangerous. I agree that normally it is only Disruptive.
> On Feb 8, 2021, at 19:52, Skip Montanaro <skip.montanaro@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>> It is certainly a dangerous function to have mapped to such
>>> an easy key to hit
>>
>> Agree 100%:
>>
>> (put 'suspend-frame 'disabled t)
>> (global-unset-key "\C-z")
>> (global-unset-key "\C-x\C-z")
>>
>
> In what way is it dangerous? At least on the various Unix and Linux systems
> I've used over the years, the worst that happens is that it hides/iconifies
> the frame. Just reopen it.
>
> It definitely should not be disabled in tty mode.
>
> Skip
- Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, (continued)
- Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/09
- Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Skip Montanaro, 2021/02/09
- Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/09
- no job control in this shell (was: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users), Skip Montanaro, 2021/02/09
- Re: no job control in this shell (was: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users), Emanuel Berg, 2021/02/10
- Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/10
- Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Skip Montanaro, 2021/02/09
- Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users,
Francis Belliveau <=
- Re: Proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Marcin Borkowski, 2021/02/09
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/09
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Yuri Khan, 2021/02/09
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Marcin Borkowski, 2021/02/09
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Jean Louis, 2021/02/10
- Re: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users, Gregory Heytings, 2021/02/09
- C-z, C-c, job control commands [was: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users], tomas, 2021/02/09
- Re: C-z, C-c, job control commands [was: not good proposal: "C-z <letter>" reserved for users], Skip Montanaro, 2021/02/09