Re: [Help-gnunet] Ubuntu Binary Package Signatures

[awd-s]

Thanks for the help.

At this stage, I might do better to build gnunet on my box using the source 
downloaded from the web-site, instead of using the binary packages.

At least I will know how to do it when I'm done.

What's your opinion?


-----Original Message-----
From: Milan Bouchet-Valat [mailto:address@hidden
Sent: Thursday, December 17, 2009 11:15 AM
To: address@hidden
Cc: address@hidden
Subject: Re:        [Help-gnunet] Ubuntu Binary Package Signatures

OK, thanks for the debugging. The problem is that in Debian versioning,
0.4.0~pre1-1 < 0.4.0 because the upstream version is considered as being
0.4.0~pre1.

On top of this problem, I can't force Launchpad to build the package
using our PPA version of libmicrohttpd, i.e. libmicrohttpd5. The
automated ${shlibs:Depends} variable only gets libmicrohttpd4.

I'm still struggling to find a solution (maybe building it in Karmic
first). Markus, ideas ?