Re: [Lynx-dev] problems using google

[Jude DaShiell]

Low graphics environments include such items as navy ships at sea among
others.  The Navy just before I retired figured this out and made its
mandatory web based training accessible.  That accessibility also made
the mandatory training work much better and faster in low graphics
environments.  So the Navy by complying with the law got a second
unexpected benefit from compliance.

On Fri, 15 Nov 2019, David Woolley wrote:

> Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 05:55:40
> From: David Woolley <address@hidden>
> To: address@hidden
> Subject: Re: [Lynx-dev] problems using google
>
> On 15/11/2019 00:52, Karen Lewellen wrote:
> > I simply do not follow how Google believes? it can take choices away in this
> > fashion simply because they are tired of trying to? support choices, so want
> > to? educate myself, and perhaps do some press of my own.
>
> I find it difficult to believe that Google would risk class action law suits
> over this, and that there has been no mention on the W3C-WAI mailing list.
>
> On the other hand, to the extent it is true, it demonstrates why it is
> unreasonable to expect a volunteer maintained lynx browser to track and
> compensate for a the google search web site, if Google with billions of
> dollars behind them cannot copes with the corporate preferred accessibility
> aid, which is trying to work with real life web sites.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Lynx-dev mailing list
> address@hidden
> https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lynx-dev
>
>

--