Re: [Mldonkey-users] Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other

[Michael Panteleit]

MLdonkey <address@hidden> writes:

> we have "good sources" for clients where we want a chunk, and we are
> not too far in the queue,

Is it possib
 and "bad sources" for both the former
> "concurrent sources" and those eMule clients where we are too far in
> the queue.
> 
> The main difference would be that good sources have to be connected
> often (every 10 minutes say), while bad sources would be connected
> much less often (every hour for example).
> 
> Should we start implementing this new scheme, or somebody has another
> proposal (or wants to keep the old system) ?
> 
> - MLDonkey