[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] No download for some, fulldownloads for the other
From: |
Roland Arendes |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] No download for some, fulldownloads for the other |
Date: |
Mon, 23 Dec 2002 22:40:26 +0100 |
hi Stephane Goulet,
>> Btw: I doubt it will make sense to not connect to emules. We all have
>> the same statistics for them: 5% mldonkey, 94% emule, 1% edonkey(bot).
>>
>> As I already said, mldonkeys are very bad at uploading (divide your
>> total uploads / uptime and you'll see the real upload rate, which is
>> way NOT max_hard_upload_rate), so .. emules are nearly the only sources
>> we'll have (except overnet).
SG> I disagree on this, yes emules are 90%+ of the clients over there they take
SG> 80%+ of our uploads, but they send us what? 3-5% of what we get.. We get our
SG> bytes from edonkey(bot or not), some from mldonkey, and used to get lots
SG> from overnet(hope this gets solved soon ;) ).. Connecting to emules is
SG> mostly a waste of time unless maybe you fake being an emule.. :(
Hm.
CLIENT 1:
Total downloads: 1951121515
eDonkey: 718410948 (36.82 %)
old mldonkey: 55119400 (2.83 %)
new mldonkey: 189020359 (9.69 %)
Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 988570808 (50.67 %)
Uptime: nearly 1 day.
CLIENT 2:
Total downloads: 55640510
eDonkey: 31220242 (56.11 %)
old mldonkey: 33120 (0.06 %)
new mldonkey: 4574632 (8.22 %)
Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 19812516 (35.61 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Uptime: ~4 hours
CLIENT 3:
Total downloads: 6763916845
eDonkey: 3083098565 (45.58 %)
old mldonkey: 1087503189 (16.08 %)
new mldonkey: 318936144 (4.72 %)
Overnet: 1555217662 (22.99 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 719161285 (10.63 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Uptime: 4 Days 2 hours
But, I agree, we have to make the emule-support better. It would be
great to "clone" an emule in its behaviour (even source propagation).
-roland
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other, (continued)
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other, Sven Hartge, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Re: Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other, MLdonkey, 2002/12/23
- [Mldonkey-users] Re: Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other, Sven Hartge, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other, Alois, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other, Roland Arendes, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other, Pierre Etchemaite, 2002/12/23
- [Mldonkey-users] No download for some, fulldownloads for the other, Stephane Goulet, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] No download for some, fulldownloads for the other,
Roland Arendes <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] No download for some, fulldownloads for theother, Stephane Goulet, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] No download for some, fulldownloads for the other, Jarek Hirny, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Investigation: No download for some, full downloads for the other, MLdonkey, 2002/12/23
- Message not available
- Message not available
- [Mldonkey-users] New source management, Alois, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] New source management, Pierre Etchemaite, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] New source management, Alois, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] New source management, MLdonkey, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] New source management, Joseph, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Investigation: No download for some, fulldownloads for the other, René Gallati, 2002/12/23
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] Investigation: No download for some, fulldownloads for the other, MLdonkey, 2002/12/23