Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey

[Goswin Brederlow]

Ultimateclem <address@hidden> writes:

> Le Mardi 7 Janvier 2003 21:29, Jochen Radmacher a écrit :
> > Hi,
> >
> > Roland Arendes wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > FYI
> > >
> > > --
> > > Added MLDonkey to the statistic
> > >
> > > MLDonkey Emulation
> > > MLDonkey is very unfair against eMule users. It allows only one third of
> > > the uploadqueue to beoccupied by eMule clients.
> >
> > We need something that does not favor one particular client, or we will
> > always see such mods...
> > How about making the distribution dynamic, dependend on " seen" or
> > "downloaded" in the statistic. If the download comes mainly from one
> > client Type, even it is emule( i doubt that...), this type of client
> > should get the most upload.
> 
> If I summarize all was said about emule against mldonkey : we have a problem 
> of leeching. I do not think that mld wants to favor one or the other client 
> in particular, but mld, in general, download from other clients to give to 
> emule.
> I agree to the idea of a distribution of upload slots proportionaly to the 
> downloads, in theory, this is perfect to avoid leeching. But in practice I'm 
> afraid this will reduce the bandwith of the upload (so the download bandwith 
> for the peers)... I prefer to leech than to see my upload speed reduced (want 
> to favorise the download of the others, hoping that the others will do the 
> same). That's my opinion.

You would give that client the next slot that has the most deserving
type. That does in no way affect the amount you upload. It just
changes who benefits.

> > > Additionally it favourises MLDonkey by giving
> > > them always a slot.
> >
> > That's not good Style.
> > The only  ones who should  always have  a slot are my Friends!
> 
> :-)

yes. And friends should get more bandwith too.
And clients that do upload to me too. Make them second class friends.

> > > In drder not to have this disadvantage MavMule emulates a MLDonkey client
> > > when he connects
> > > to an MLDonkey client.
> >
> > That raises one Question: Who is the first client that says: Im a
> > [emule/mldonkey]-client? If it is the connecting client, we could "play
> > emule" in that case. But this should only be a temporary fix...
> 
> arf. I can imagine funny situations...
> 
> >
> > Jochen
> >
> 
> Well, this message is the first I've seen in this list about a "cooperation" 
> between mld and emule... I don't know if I have to be hapy for this first 
> step or disappointed by the way engaged....
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Mldonkey-users mailing list
> address@hidden
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/mldonkey-users
MfG
        Goswin