[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey
From: |
Manu Bork |
Subject: |
Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey |
Date: |
Wed, 8 Jan 2003 22:06:14 +0100 |
On 08 Jan 2003 21:08:52 +0100
Goswin Brederlow <address@hidden> wrote:
> "Roland Arendes" <address@hidden> writes:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > >> We need something that does not favor one particular client, or we will
> > >> always see such mods...
> > >> How about making the distribution dynamic, dependend on " seen" or
> > >> "downloaded" in the statistic. If the download comes mainly from one
> > >> client Type, even it is emule( i doubt that...), this type of client
> > >> should get the most upload.
> > > Indeed, since it's easy to fake a mldonkey client.. we really should have
> > > more complex mldonkey authentification scheme, emules uses protocol
> > > extensions not so easy to reverse engeneer, we should have harder ones so
> > > they wont fake us so easyly.
> >
> > Sorry, but this is DEFINITELY the wrong way. I already awaited this step
> > from some emule-mod coder. And, I don't know whats the problem of some
> > people here giving upload mostly to emule. THE WHOLE NET IS NEARLY
> > COMPLETE EMULE!
> >
> > And, furthermore, they ARE NOT leeching.
> >
> > Uptime: 227888 seconds (2+15:18)
> >
> > Total downloads: 3619618990
> > eDonkey: 959500708 (26.51 %)
> > old mldonkey: 67756225 (1.87 %)
> > new mldonkey: 937002425 (25.89 %)
> > Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
> > old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
> > new eMule: 1655359632 (45.73 %)
> > server: 0 (0.00 %)
> >
> > Total uploads: 708489216
> > eDonkey: 128686231 (18.16 %)
> > old mldonkey: 14607360 (2.06 %)
> > new mldonkey: 220058231 (31.06 %)
> > Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
> > old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
> > new eMule: 345137394 (48.71 %)
> > server: 0 (0.00 %)
> >
> >
> > I'm using MLDonkey 2.01+pango20021213b without this stupid
> > emule-slot-limiting at all. Well, aggressive client banning is okay,
> > because it is not specific to one client and will only hit unsocial
> > modified ones.
>
> Uptime: 194981 seconds (2+06:09)
> Total seens: 202464
> eDonkey: 7194 (3.55 %)
> old mldonkey: 7809 (3.86 %)
> new mldonkey: 143043 (70.65 %)
> Overnet: 2838 (1.40 %)
> old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
> new eMule: 41580 (20.54 %)
> server: 0 (0.00 %)
> Total filerequests received: 1584639
> eDonkey: 9171 (0.58 %)
> old mldonkey: 196226 (12.38 %)
> new mldonkey: 462635 (29.19 %)
> Overnet: 626275 (39.52 %)
> old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
> new eMule: 290332 (18.32 %)
> server: 0 (0.00 %)
> Total downloads: 3985493989
> eDonkey: 1577385090 (39.58 %)
> old mldonkey: 154119885 (3.87 %)
> new mldonkey: 528473497 (13.26 %)
> Overnet: 999116163 (25.07 %)
> old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
> new eMule: 726399354 (18.23 %)
> server: 0 (0.00 %)
> Total uploads: 468194304
> eDonkey: 152217772 (32.51 %)
> old mldonkey: 6326896 (1.35 %)
> new mldonkey: 113971585 (24.34 %)
> Overnet: 995328 (0.21 %)
> old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
> new eMule: 194682723 (41.58 %)
> server: 0 (0.00 %)
> Total banneds: 394
> eDonkey: 0 (0.00 %)
> old mldonkey: 56 (14.21 %)
> new mldonkey: 244 (61.93 %)
> Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
> old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
> new eMule: 94 (23.86 %)
> server: 0 (0.00 %)
>
>
> 70% mldonkey clients. The net is MLDONKEY (+ emule fakes).
> Thats changed a lot in the last days it seems.
>
> But still: 20% of my clients get 40% of my uploads but only provide
> 20% downloads. Sharing seems OK but leeching is too high. And I have
> the minimum emule slots.
>
hi
here are my stats; I'm running MLDonkey 2.02-0: Objective-Caml Client/Server
for the eDonkey2000 Network without any patches - I'm getting more from eMule
than I give them. I have a big uptime so perhaps my stats could be usefull.
Uptime: 279299 seconds (3+05:34)
Total seens: 624111
eDonkey: 6875 (1.10 %)
old mldonkey: 1560 (0.25 %)
new mldonkey: 9016 (1.44 %)
Overnet: 379 (0.06 %)
old eMule: 7 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 606274 (97.14 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total filerequests received: 826378
eDonkey: 7119 (0.86 %)
old mldonkey: 44239 (5.35 %)
new mldonkey: 53347 (6.46 %)
Overnet: 7832 (0.95 %)
old eMule: 19 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 713822 (86.38 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total downloads: 2352685003
eDonkey: 492572367 (20.94 %)
old mldonkey: 19771442 (0.84 %)
new mldonkey: 270607122 (11.50 %)
Overnet: 52021760 (2.21 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 1517712312 (64.51 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total uploads: 1510046720
eDonkey: 38050944 (2.52 %)
old mldonkey: 40905582 (2.71 %)
new mldonkey: 215795546 (14.29 %)
Overnet: 86000441 (5.70 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 1129294207 (74.79 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
Total banneds: 140
eDonkey: 0 (0.00 %)
old mldonkey: 14 (10.00 %)
new mldonkey: 12 (8.57 %)
Overnet: 0 (0.00 %)
old eMule: 0 (0.00 %)
new eMule: 114 (81.43 %)
server: 0 (0.00 %)
max_emule_slots = 80
I'm downloading both good and bad available files.
Hope it'll help you in some way to find out the way mldonkey interacts with
emule.
CU Manu
- [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Roland Arendes, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Jochen Radmacher, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Goswin Brederlow, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Stephane Goulet, 2003/01/07
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Roland Arendes, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Goswin Brederlow, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey,
Manu Bork <=
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Roland Arendes, 2003/01/08
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, MLdonkey, 2003/01/09
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, Michael Panteleit, 2003/01/09
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, MLdonkey, 2003/01/09
- [Mldonkey-users] md4 computing (was: Re: eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey), Michael Panteleit, 2003/01/09
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] md4 computing (was: Re: eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey), MLdonkey, 2003/01/09
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] md4 computing (was: Re: eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey), Martin, 2003/01/09
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] md4 computing (was: Re: eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey), Marcus Pillekamp, 2003/01/10
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] md4 computing (was: Re: eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey), Goswin Brederlow, 2003/01/09
- Re: [Mldonkey-users] eMule Mod to emulate mldonkey, payday, 2003/01/09