[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!
From: |
Daniel |
Subject: |
Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!! |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2000 15:52:43 -0400 |
Steve Mosher wrote the following about pitch-shifting:
> Really? I read some stuff about how it was impossible to get
> right... but that might have been restricted to analog. Anyhow, if you can
> do it, that's really cool. I was going to try one (with a theory I had),
> but I ran into problems.
i also have a theory, but about the
"opposite" transformation: time
stretching/compression *without*
pitch-shifting. perhaps similar
solutions apply? does anyone know what
the state-of-the-art algorithm is for
non-pitch-shifting time dilation?
daniel
- [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, (continued)
- [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/15
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/15
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, address@hidden, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!,
Daniel <=
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Edward Coffey, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Davíð B Fanzson, 2000/05/17
- [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Ross Litscher, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Gary Richardson, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- RE: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Unkargherth, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, joost diepenmaat, 2000/05/17
- OT: Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Matt Stanton, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/17