[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!
From: |
Steve Mosher |
Subject: |
Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!! |
Date: |
Tue, 16 May 2000 14:27:52 -0300 |
On Tue, 16 May 2000, Dave O'Toole wrote:
> That would be cool, but if it was going to sound at all decent we'd very
> quickly run out of polyphony. It's computationally expensive.
>
> This isn't to say that pitch-shifting isn't useful. I use it everywhere.
You're right. I totally forgot about that, since I was preoccupied
with quality. That, and you can't get a very full range of notes with
quality that way (I think the limit is something like 200%, or one
octave).
--
"The problem is that you haven't put enough peanut butter on the CPUfan."
-- Alan DeKok in response to a stupid question.
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, (continued)
- Re: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/14
- [Octal-dev] literate programming / patterns.... let's document our work, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] literate programming / patterns.... let's document our work, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/14
- [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/15
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/15
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, address@hidden, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!,
Steve Mosher <=
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Daniel, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Steve Mosher, 2000/05/16
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Edward Coffey, 2000/05/17
- Re: [Octal-dev] OCTAL Technical Article!!!, Davíð B Fanzson, 2000/05/17
- [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Ross Litscher, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Gary Richardson, 2000/05/14
- Re: [Octal-dev] possibly irrelevant idea, Dave O'Toole, 2000/05/14
- RE: [Octal-dev] is a "gearlib" wanted/needed/possible/trivial?, Unkargherth, 2000/05/16