pan-users
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?


From: Duncan
Subject: [Pan-users] Re: Anyone get pan compiling with gcc 4.3 yet?
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2008 11:50:41 +0000 (UTC)
User-agent: Pan/0.132 (Waxed in Black)

Keith Richie <address@hidden>
posted address@hidden, excerpted below, on  Mon, 24 Mar 2008
18:50:25 +0000:

> Upgraded to gcc4.3 today on Arch 64bit. Copy, pasted and applied the
> undiluted patch,  everything went well from a fresh svn check out.

Not so lucky here.

First, gentoo's epatch (package managed patching) choked on the first two 
entries... to the same place of the same file.  I combined them into one, 
and it applied fine.

However, that wasn't the only issue, tho the other isn't gcc 4.3 related 
I don't think.  glib 2.16 appears to be a missing function (g_assert) 
that pan wants from glib.  It was in glib 2.14 (I just redownloaded and 
checked the sources for 2.14.6), but not the 2.16(.1) I have installed 
here.

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524620

I'll probably revert to glib 2.14.x here shortly.

Meanwhile, pan compiled against 2.14.x as I had it installed before the 
update seems to work fine against glib 2.16.1.  I suppose it just hasn't 
hit the assert yet.  Either that or it didn't use it six months or 
whatever ago when I last successfully compiled.  But I doubt that as 
Charles hasn't been too active on pan lately, so I expect that dependency 
has been there for awhile.

BTW, I didn't see the gcc 4.3 pan patches bugged yet when I filed the 
above, so I went ahead and bugged it as:

http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=524625

> I didn't thoroughly test this build out. But I am posting from the
> freshly installed package, browsed a few other Gmane lists, thanks to
> you btw. I had never heard of Gmane before I read it in one of your
> posts.

It's cool, isn't it?  =8^)  No more filling up the mailbox (or gmailbox 
either) just to follow a few lists!  I don't know why folks use lists 
anyway.  That's what newsgroups are for!  =8^)  Save the mailbox for the 
personal/work/whatever mail (and spam).

-- 
Duncan - List replies preferred.   No HTML msgs.
"Every nonfree program has a lord, a master --
and if you use the program, he is your master."  Richard Stallman





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]