|From:||Marcus G. Daniels|
|Subject:||Re: [swarm-hackers] Can somebody declare a CVS "version" that works?|
|Date:||Mon, 25 Aug 2008 14:09:11 -0600|
|User-agent:||Thunderbird 188.8.131.52 (Windows/20080708)|
Paul Johnson wrote:
I'm trying to get back in the Swarm support game by building RPMS and Debian packages. Are we still using the Savannah CVS server? I just did "cvs update" in my working directory and the VERSION file still says 2.2.4. That can't be right, can it?Hmm, I think it is probably possible to apply the same kind of BLT patch to 2.4 and get a working version with Tcl/Tk 8.5. I think Fedora's built of BLT 2.4 just overlooked that case because it requires using the BLT `busy' feature to create the crash. Probably better to stick with BLT 2.4 instead of 3.0 to minimize confusion. Because then there isn't a need to do the extra initialization steps for BLT 3.0, Swarm won't need any modification for that.
As far as the Swarm versioning goes, I haven't touched the VERSION file forever. Let me know if the BLT tweak works for Tcl/Tk 8.5 and I'll bump it to 2.2.5 and tag it. But no point in doing that till you have it working as further changes may be needed (for whatever reason).
|[Prev in Thread]||Current Thread||[Next in Thread]|