Re: [Traverso-devel] Proposal: changing Sheet concept in Traverso

[plutek]

Excerpts from Anthony Bisset's message of Tue Jun 08 12:46:11 -0400 2010:
> Hi Remon & Plutek,
> 
> I've been doing a lot of mastering recently (past ~6 months). The  
> commercial software I use does not have the Traverso sheet  
> functionality and I wish it did.

is your *reason* for wanting the "sheet" functionality similar to mine?

> A
> 
> On Jun 9, 2010, at 12:13 AM, plutek wrote:
> >
> > we often need quite different mix setups for various songs on a CD.  
> > i don't think there's ANY really logical way of keeping all that on  
> > one timeline -- we might have different plugins, different tracks,  
> > etc., etc., so separate "sessions" of some sort makes sense. in  
> > traverso with Sheets, at least we could keep various radically  
> > different mix setups together within one project, and switch  
> > effortlessly between them. then we can write out the mixed tracks,  
> > and set those up in another sheet to play with the sequencing, fine- 
> > tune the heads and tails, and do the mastering, which makes sense,  
> > conceptually, because we are looking at unifying the project at that  
> > point.

-- 
.pltk.