[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?
From: |
Al Gilman |
Subject: |
Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list? |
Date: |
Thu, 7 Nov 1996 08:27:56 -0500 (EST) |
From: address@hidden (Larry W. Virden, x2487)
What I mean is that in some manner, either at compile or run time, we
should consider providing a way to make lynx as easy to use for the
speech synthesisers as possible - if we are going to use this segment
of the internet as a bargaining chip when harassing sites to make them
lynx compatible.
There are two strategies I have been mulling:
- define a capability-envelope for a virtual terminal class
that at least 80% of the screen readers can use; use the
TERMCAP/TERMINFO mechanism to tell lynx that this is what you
have; let curses handle it. This is eminently doable. If
for example Gregory and Patrick J. Burke agreed to lead a caucus in
lynx-learners to define the virtual terminal, that would get
done, and then they could explain what to do with the
capabilities of that terminal. This already would be a
significant positive step.
- [more work] Fote talked about six styles used in rendering
UL. If you study the problem, you realize that you want to
tear up the display algorithms clear back before curses and use
a different library of styles to present an HText in speech
than on VT-100. For example, a SELECT feature in the HText
would be managed in the user dialog much the same as a
vertically-stacked column of RADIO button options, where the
speech user is able to index through the options and hear one
at a time (possibly with pop out to wrapper, pop back to
current index).
That's a dump of currently resident confusion on speech-friendly webbing
in this noggin.
Al Gilman
;
; To UNSUBSCRIBE: Send a mail message to address@hidden
; with "unsubscribe lynx-dev" (without the
; quotation marks) on a line by itself.
;
- LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), (continued)
- LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/04
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Audin Malmin, 1996/11/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Walter Skorski, 1996/11/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/05
- Re: LYNX-DEV Bookmarks - a better idea (?), Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/06
- LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/06
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?,
Al Gilman <=
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Larry W. Virden, x2487, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Al Gilman, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Benjamin C. W. Sittler, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Al Gilman, 1996/11/08
- LYNX-DEV trickle-down development?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/08
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Walter Skorski, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, Filip M Gieszczykiewicz, 1996/11/07
- Re: LYNX-DEV why not use shift-V to access multiple bookmarks list?, gregory j. rosmaita, 1996/11/07