[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz
From: |
Leonid Pauzner |
Subject: |
Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz |
Date: |
Sat, 8 May 1999 17:48:27 +0400 (MSD) |
> * From: address@hidden
> * In-Reply-To:
> <address@hidden>
> from "Vlad Harchev <address@hidden>" at May 3, 99 05:15:37 am
>> > It is reasonable to include generated *.html files into the 2.8.2
>> > distribution (like we have with gettext' lynx.pot) and leave portability
>> > and maintenance for 2.8.3 development. At least we got a very useful
>> > resource (hmm, make install-cfghelp ?) and set a starting point for future
>> > resync body.in with lynx.cfg. See also Vlad's letter below.
>>
>> IMO it's also reasonable to apply this patch. It will modify LYReadCFG.c,
>> making for each setting name "XYZ" at page displaying 'LYNXCFG:/' hyperlinks
>> to "$(helpdir)/lynxcfg.body.html#XYZ". So, even if functionality of
>> standalone c preprocessor is not availble, user will get description of each
>> setting present in lynx.cfg.
>> We can also modify configure.in so that it will check whether $(CPP) works
>> OK, and if yes, generate *.html files.
> that doesn't work on VMS.
I mean the scripts may be assumed "experimental" and disabled by default.
But generated .html files (and links from LYNXCFG:/ page) really useful
for everyone from not restricted account (litterally, those without
NO_CONFIG_INFO defined and without LYRestricted set.
They can "RELOAD THE CHANGES" from LYNXCFG:/ page).
Whether the *.html files will be maintained by hand or generated
from (non?)portable script it is a useful user resource.
> also, it doesn't matter if $(CPP) "works". there are a number of workable
> C preprocessors that simply refuse to process files that don't look like
> C language (in fact, there's no requirement that they do so - one of the
> problems the X Consortium ran into in porting imake: they had to make
> arrangements with some vendors to retain a K&R-style cpp to continue).
>>
>> BTW, "Single UNIX specification, Version 2", and POSIX, both require support
>> of '-E' swtich from 'cc' and 'c89' - they should do preprocessing-only, so IM
> O
>> absense of support for this switch is very rare.
>>
>> >[...]
>>
>> Best regards,
>> -Vlad
> --
> Thomas E. Dickey
> address@hidden
> http://www.clark.net/pub/dickey
> _________________________________________________________________
> * Prev by Date: lynx-dev US Gov't mandates hadicapped web access
> * Next by Date: Re: lynx-dev US Gov't mandates hadicapped web access
> * Prev by thread: Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz
> * Next by thread: Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz
> * Index(es):
> + Date
> + Thread
> _________________________________________________________________
> Lynx mailing list archives
> [FLORA HOME] [LYNX Home]
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, (continued)
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/05/07
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, dickey, 1999/05/07
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/08
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, dickey, 1999/05/08
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, dickey, 1999/05/08
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/05/08
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz,
Leonid Pauzner <=
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, dickey, 1999/05/08
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Leonid Pauzner, 1999/05/09
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/10
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/10
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Bela Lubkin, 1999/05/10
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/10
- Re: lynx-dev lynx2.8.2dev.25d-cpp.patch.gz, Henry Nelson, 1999/05/10